• Home
  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us

open access eISSN 2093-3673

Journal
Impact Factor

1.4

Article View

Forthcoming Articles

Anat Cell Biol

Published online November 6, 2024

https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.24.125

Copyright © Korean Association of ANATOMISTS.

Cost-effectiveness and other considerations for different research techniques applied in ancient DNA analysis

Jong Ha Hong1 , Hisashi Fujita2 , Jaehyup Kim3 , Dong Hoon Shin4

1Institute of Korean Archaeology and Ancient History, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea, 2Institute for the Study of Ancient Civilizations and Cultural Resources, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan, 3Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA, 4Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:Dong Hoon Shin
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
E-mail: cuteminjae@gmail.com

Received: May 13, 2024; Revised: August 16, 2024; Accepted: September 15, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis has developed rapidly since it first emerged in the 1980s, becoming an almost indispensable tool in anthropological and archaeological sciences. Earlier aDNA study was based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, with which, unfortunately, modern DNA contamination and other authenticity issues were often incurred. These technical hurdles were soon overcome by application of advancements in the forms of the next generation sequencing (NGS) technique and others. However, since NGS requires money, time, and, in the case of large projects, manpower as well, genetic analysis of some ancient samples considered to be insignificant is commonly delayed or, in the worst cases, neglected entirely. We acknowledge that as a diagnostic tool in aDNA analysis, PCR is less accurate than NGS and more easily affected by modern DNA contamination; but it also has advantages, such as simplicity, time-saving, and greater ease of interpretation, among others. The role of PCR in aDNA analysis, then, should be reconsidered.

Keywords: DNA, ancient, Commerce, Efficiency, Polymerase chain reaction, High-throughput nucleotide sequencing

Share this article on :