• Home
  • Sitemap
  • Contact us

Article View

Original Article

Anat Cell Biol 2021; 54(1): 18-24

Published online March 31, 2021

https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.20.176

Copyright © Korean Association of ANATOMISTS.

Assessment of thickness of in vivo autograft tendons around the knee and its correlation with anthropometric data, thickness of patella and anterior cruciate ligament tibial foot print diameter

Balgovind S Raja , Kshitij Gupta , Abdusamad V , Sukhmin Singh , Subhajit Maji

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India

Correspondence to:Kshitij Gupta
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand 249203, India
E-mail: kshitizg001@gmail.com

Received: July 13, 2020; Revised: October 17, 2020; Accepted: November 26, 2020

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Inadequate diameters of the autograft tendons are known to be a major cause of graft failure in ligament reconstruction. The purpose of the study was to measure the in-vivo thickness of the available autograft options around the knee and to seek a correlation between the thickness of the tendons and the anthropometric data, patellar thickness and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint sagittal diameter. Magnetic resonance imaging of 104 consecutive patients with suspected knee injuries were utilized for measurement of the in vivo thickness of pes anserinus tendon (diameter and cross-sectional area [CSA]), patellar tendon (PT) and quadriceps tendon (QT). Pearson’s coefficient was used to find out the relationship between the tendon thickness and anthropometric data, thickness of patella and ACL tibial foot print sagittal diameter. The mean diameters and CSA of the semitendinosus tendon (ST) and gracilis tendon (GT) were 3.77±0.49 mm, 11.62±1.62 mm2 and 2.87±0.27 mm, 6.64±1.18 mm2 respectively. QT and PT thicknesses were 7.36±0.87 mm and 4.50±0.62 mm respectively. Height and the patellar thickness were seen to have moderate correlation with ST and PT thickness. Weak correlation was seen between the other anthropometric variables and tendon thickness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of tendon sizes is a reliable method with good inter and intra-rater agreement. Assessment of these anatomical structures with help of MRI would be helpful in preoperative planning and can help in identifying those patients at risk of having smaller tendons.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Magnetic resonance imaging, Patellar ligament, Hamstring tendons, Arthroscopy

Incidences of ligament injuries are on the rise over the decades due to increased involvement in sports activities. Reconstructive surgeries using autografts have altered the scenario in regards to the management of ligament injuries. Unsatisfactory graft diameters often lead to failure [1-3] especially in situations like multiligament knee injuries [4]. A thorough knowledge about the graft options becomes extremely vital in preventing such situations and knowledge regarding the alternate options other than the conventional pes anserinus tendons would lead to a less painstaking experience.

The autografts used in knee ligament reconstructive surgery includes pes anserinus tendons, bone patella tendon bone (BPTB) graft, quadriceps tendon (QT) and peroneus longus. It’s difficult to predict the size of these tendons prior to harvest. The pes anserinus tendons have a great variability in their length and diameters [5]. This variability often percolates to a situation in which one finds the graft either small in diameter or shorter in length. Of the studies present pertaining the prediction of tendon size, a recent systematic review found out that only 20% of pes anserinus tendon size can be predicted by knowing patient’s height [1, 6-9].

Various studies have assessed the cross-sectional area (CSA) and diameters of pes anserinus tendons preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging and correlated it with intraoperative diameters [10-15]. However, there is a paucity of literature in the Indian scenario regarding the thickness of the pes anserinus tendons, the QT and the patellar tendon (PT) [16-18]. We did an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based study to find out the CSA and diameters of pes anserinus tendons, thickness of QT, thickness of the PT and the relation of the these anatomical structures with patient’s height, weight, sex, patellar thickness and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) foot print sagittal diameter. This study hopes to offer a normal baseline in Indian population from which future studies could be developed.

The study enrolled MRI of 114 consecutive patients with suspected knee injury who presented to our tertiary care centre (All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh) after approval from institutional ethics committee (No. 253/IEC/PGM/2018). Exclusion criteria included knees with osteoarthritic changes, abnormalities of extensor mechanism, history of previous surgery and history of patellar dislocation or subluxation. A total of 104 patients were selected for the study using the exclusion criteria. The study period was September 2018 to August 2019. The average age of the subject group was 28 years (standard deviation 4.8) with 58 males and 46 females. The height, weight and body mass index (BMI) were recorded for the enrolled patients. The MRIs were performed with a Sigma 1.5 T MRI System (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with the patients’ knee in extended position and a slice thickness of 3 mm.

Sagittal proton density T1- or T2-weighted slice in which the patellar and QT appears to have the maximum diameters are chosen for measurement of tendon thickness. PT thickness is measured as the mean of three measurements done at 1cm from the lower pole of the patella, midpoint of the PT, and 1 cm above the upper border of the lower attachment of tendon (Fig. 1A) [19]. The QT thickness is calculated as the mean of three measurements at 10 mm, 20 mm, and 30 mm from the upper border of patella (Fig. 1A) [11]. Axial T2W slice at the level of the joint was used to calculate the CSA and the tendon diameter of the pes anserinus tendons [14, 15]. The method of measurement is illustrated in Fig. 2. A schematic representation of patellar and QT thickness measurement has been shown in Fig. 3A with measurement of pes anserinus tendon diameter and CSA in Fig. 3B. The free hand tool of the Osirix software (Osirix 9.5; Pixmeo Sarl, Bernex, Switzerland) was used for the measurement of CSA (Fig. 2A). The axial T2 image showing the thickest patella (including the cartilage) of all the images is used to assess the thickness of the patella. The thickness of the patella is measured perpendicular to the axis of patella obtained by joining the medial and lateral most ends (Fig. 1C) [20]. The tibial foot print sagittal diameter of the ACL was assessed in the sagittal T2 image showing the maximum length of the foot print (Fig. 1B) [21].

Figure 1. T2 weighted sagittal MRI image showing the largest diameter of patella and QT taken (A) to measure patellar and QT thickness at three points as described. T2 weighted sagittal MRI slice showing largest diameter of ACL tibial footprint taken (B) for ACL footprint measurement. T2 axial image showing thickest patella (C) used to measure patella thickness as described. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; QT, quadriceps tendon.

Figure 2. Axial T2 weighted MRI slice at the level of the joint used to calculate the cross-sectional area and the diameter of pes anserinus tendons. The free hand tool of the Osirix software used to measure the CSA of pes anserinus tendons (A). Largest diameter at the chosen slice taken as the diameter of pes anserinus tendons (B). CSA, cross-sectional area; GT, gracilis tendon; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ST, semitendinosus.

Figure 3. Schematic diagram: method of measurement of patellar and QT thickness on sagittal slice of MRI (A) and method of measurement of pes anserinus tendons’ diameter and CSA in the axial section of MRI (B). CSA, cross-sectional area; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; QT, quadriceps tendon.

The values are expressed as mean±standard deviation. The statistical analysis was done with SPSS software and Student’s t-test/Mann Whitney test was employed after checking the normality with Shapiro-Wilk test. A value of P<0.05 is considered as significant. Ten MRI measurements were assessed by a single examiner (first author) 2 times and by two different observers (first and second authors) to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability. The relationship between the pes anserinus tendon diameter and CSA, PT, and QT thickness with anthropometric data, thickness of the patella and ACL tibial foot were calculated using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

The mean diameters of the semitendinosus tendon (ST) and gracilis tendon (GT) were 3.77±0.49 mm and 2.87±0.27 mm respectively. QT and PT thicknesses were 7.36±0.87 mm and 4.50±0.62 mm respectively. The mean CSA of the pes anserinus tendons were 11.62±1.62 mm2 and 6.64±1.18 mm2 for ST and GT respectively. The mean patella thickness was 21.05±0.89 mm and the mean ACL tibial footprint sagittal diameter was 15.29±1.7 mm. The sex wise comparison of these anatomical structures is expressed in Table 1. The mean patient’s height, weight and BMI were 166.9±6.55 cm, 73.4±7.41 kg and 22.7±2.71 kg/m2 respectively. Assessment of correlation coefficients revealed a significant but moderate positive association of height with STmeasurements (diameter and CSA) and PT thickness.

Table 1 . Sex wise comparison of various anatomical knee structures as measured on preoperative MRIs

VariableMean (n=104)Male (n=58)Female (n=46)P-value
Diametera)
ST3.77±0.493.98±0.393.51±0.48< 0.05
GT2.87±0.272.90±0.302.84±0.22>0.05
Thicknessa)
QT7.36±0.877.45±0.957.23±0.76>0.05
PT4.50±0.624.64±0.714.29±0.41<0.05
CSAb)
ST11.62±1.6212.03±1.5311.10±1.75<0.01
GT6.64±1.186.66±1.066.62±1.30>0.05

Values are presented as mean±SD. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ST, semitendinosustendon GT, gracilis tendon PT, patellar tendon QT, quadriceps tendon CSA, cross-sectional area. P-value<0.05 is significant. a)Expressed in millimetres b)Expressed in millimetres square (mm2).



Patient’s height was also found to have a weak association with gracillis tendon measurements (diameter and CSA) and QT thickness. Patellar thickness was seen to have moderate correlation with ST CSA and PT thickness while a significant, moderate correlation was seen between ACL tibial foot print sagittal diameter with semitendinosus CSA. No significant correlation was found between patient’s weight or BMI and thickness of tendons. A detailed explanation of the relationships beween tendon thickness and the variable assessed has been given in Table 2. An excellent inter and intra-observer reliability was seen with the techniques of measurement of tendon thickness in MRI as depicted in Table 3.

Table 2 . Assessment of coefficient of correlation of different anatomical structures with anthropometric variables, patellar thickness and ACL footprint diameter

Anatomical structure studiedHeightWeightBMIPatellar thicknessACL tibial foot print diameter
Semitendinosus:
Diameterr=0.47 (P<0.001)r=0.27 (P<0.001)0.08 (P=0.271)0.40 (P<0.001)0.35 (P<0.001)
CSAr=0.43 (P<0.001)r=0.24 (P<0.001)0.08 (P=0.311)0.42 (P<0.001)0.40 (P<0.001)
Gracillis:
Diameterr=0.36 (P<0.001)r=0.21 (P<0.001)0.06 (P=0.348)0.27 (P<0.001)0.24 (P<0.001)
CSAr=0.38 (P<0.001)r=0.24 (P<0.001)0.07 (P=0.352)0.29 (P<0.001)0.28 (P<0.001)
Tendon Thickness:
Patellarr=0.42 (P<0.001)r=0.25 (P<0.001)0.06 (P=0.262)0.45 (P<0.001)0.34 (P<0.001)
Quadricepsr=0.31 (P<0.001)r=0.21 (P<0.001)0.08 (P=0.269)0.38 (P<0.001)0.31 (P<0.001)

ACL, anterior cruciate ligament, BMI, body mass index; CSA, cross-sectional area; r, Pearson’s coefficient.



Table 3 . Inter and intra-observer reliability in measurement of various anatomical structures

Anatomical structureIntra-observer agreement (95% CI)Inter-observer agreement (95% CI)
Quadriceps tendon thickness0.93 (0.89–0.95)0.94 (0.91–0.97)
Patella thickness0.83 (0.69–0.89)0.92 (0.83–0.98)
Patella tendon thickness0.85 (0.77–0.91)0.91 (0.79–0.97)
ACL sagittal foot print diameter0.91 (0.86–0.95)0.88 (0.70–0.96)
ST diameter0.84 (0.76–0.89)0.87 (0.77–0.95)
GT diameter0.87 (0.81–0.93)0.90 (0.84–0.92)
ST CSA0.88 (0.83–0.94)0.86 (0.81–0.92)
GT CSA0.92 (0.86–0.96)0.91 (0.83–0.96)

CI, confidence interval; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament, ST, semitendinosus tendon; GT, gracilis tendon; CSA, cross-sectional area.


A rising concern among surgeons is the association of graft failures with smaller pes anserinus tendon grafts. A recent systematic review revealed a relative risk of failure of 6.8 times for pes anserinus tendon ACL reconstructions with a graft diameter less than 8 mm [1]. Pes anserinus grafts often have the disadvantage of having a smaller diameter intraoperatively. Hence one would be wise to understand the available autografts in surgeon’s armamentarium and it would help even more if one can predict the graft sufficiency preoperatively.

Variations in the CSA and diameter of the pes anserinus tendons is often seen in consecutive MR images owing to the myotendinous bulk, irregular shapes and variable orientations of the tendons. Various literatures quote different values of these parameters owing to the difference in their methodology (Table 4) [11, 13-15, 19, 23, 27]. Hodges et al. [22] revealed that the MRI measurement at the medial joint level corresponds to most accurate intra-operative graft thickness values. The minimum combined CSA for the average person on MRI to achieve a graft size of 8 mm was 17.168 mm2 (P<0.001) by Hanna et al. [23]. Our study revealed that height has moderate correlation with the pes anserinus tendon thickness (Table 2). Patient’s height is the only anthropometric variable which showed a significant positive correlation with the graft tendon thickness. The finding is comparable to literature on Indian population on preoperative prediction of graft assessment where they find correlation of height with the tendon or graft sizes [16-18]. Goyal et al. [17] reported in their study that Indian patients with height less than 147 cm were at risk of yielding final quadrupled autograft of less than 7 mm. Our study further fortifies the fact that patient’s height is the best predictor of all graft tendon diameters. Various previous studies have also correlated patient’s anthropometric measurements with pes anserinus tendon diameter. Boisvert et al. [6] evaluated 132 patients undergoing hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction. Intraoperative graft diameter was correlated with anthropometric measurements revealing a positive correlation with of graft diameter with height in women only. Zakko et al. [11] did an MRI based study in 62 patients and found a weak correlation between anthropometric measurements and MRI based PT and QT thickness. Previous studies also showed a smaller graft diameter in the female population. Treme el al. [24] conducted a cohort study in 50 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using hamstring graft and concluded that small graft diameters are most likely in older, short, female subjects with small thigh circumferences. Our study showed significantly smaller graft thickness of ST and PT (Table 1). One should be cautious while utilizing pes anserinus and patellar tendon in ACL reconstruction in females and a use of other autograft options should be considered. The current study also correlated the patellar thickness and the ACL tibial footprint diameter with the available tendon graft sizes. Both these variables showed moderate correlation with the semitendinosus CSA while patellar thickness also showed a positive association with PT thickness.The current study is the first to study relation of the ACL tibial foot print diameter with the tendon sizes including patellar and QTs.

Table 4 . Summary of literature on preoperative tendon measurements using MRI

StudiesCountrySample size (n)Diametera)CSAb)Thicknessa)



STGTSTGTPTQT
Our studyIndian1143.77±0.492.87±0.2711.62±1.626.64±1.184.50±0.627.36±0.87
Zakko et al. [11]USA628.60±1.6023.30±5.604.30±0.808.40±1.50
Camarda et al. [13]Italy774.20±0.403.30±0.404.50±0.607.30±1.10
Beyzadeglou et al [14]Turkey514.20±0.403.10±0.30
Hanna et al. [23]USA3017.168
Hamada et al. [15]Japan7910.10±2.10
Chang et al. [19]Korea147Proximal-4.30±0.80
Middle-3.70±0.80
Distal-4.40±0.80
Cobanoglu et al. [27]Turkey70AP at JL-4.07±0.89At JL-7.38±0.90
ML at JL-2.95±0.79At PL-8.58±3.12
AP at PL-3.65±0.90
ML at PL-3.8±0.86

Values are presented as number only or mean±SD. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ST, semitendinosus tendon; GT, gracilis tendon; QT, quadriceps tendon; AP, antero-posterior diameter; ML, medio-lateral diameter; JL, joint line; PL, physeal line. a)Measurements in millimmeter (mm); b)Measurement in millimetre square (mm2).



Studies have attempted to show relationship between the pes anserinus tendon sizes with anthropometric data [11]. Zakko et al. [11] revealed moderate-to-good accuracy and high reliability of measurements of tendon sizes in MRI. Our study is the first to assess the tendon sizes of pes anserinus tendons (ST and GT) along with PT thickness and quadriceps thickness in the Indian population using MRI to the best of our knowledge and the first one to assess the relationship of ACL tibial foot print diameter with the tendon sizes.

QT and bone PT bone graft are alternate graft options in multi ligamentous knee reconstructions. Literature on the thickness of the patellar and QT is pretty rare [11, 13, 19]. Only a few of these looked into the relationship of anthropometric data with the PT thickness and QT thickness [11, 13]. Our study revealed the mean quadriceps and PT thicknesses to be 7.36±0.87 mm and 4.50±0.62 mm respectively with males having significantly larger PT diameter than female (P<0.05). Zakko et al. [11] recorded QT thickness of 8.4 mm and a PT thickness of 4.3 mm in Caucasian population. The height and thickness of the patella were seen to have moderate association with the PT thickness. Weight and height had weak relationship with the quadriceps thickness.

The study has its own limitations. First, relation of the MR findings with the intraoperative tendon sizes couldn’t be measured as majority of the cases included in the study were meniscal injuries. A study focussing on the relationship of MRI size and intra-operative tendon sizes would have been ideal but, the current study is the only one to truly assess the tendon autograft sizes in MRI in Indian population and correlate with the anthropometric data. Second, the length of the pes anserinus tendons couldn’t be measured in the study. Short tendons would lead to inadequate graft sizes intra-operatively. A long tendon would be adequate for single bundle reconstruction as one can use it either in tripled or quadrupled form. This was another shortcoming of the study. Third, the patellar bone block and the tibial tuberosity bone block thickness which is important in a BPTB graft were not measured. Age and activity levels were not included as these were extensively researched and proven to be insignificant[6, 8, 24-26]. Despite these short comings, this study holds significance in that it’s the first study in Indian population to show moderate positive correlation of height and patellar thickness with ST size and PT thickness. Moreover, this study is the first to analyse the relationship of ACL tibial foot print morphology with the auto graft sizes.

The study found moderate correlation of height and thickness of the patella with ST CSA and PT thickness. Weak correlation was seen between the patient’s anthropometric data (height, weight), ACL tibial foot print morphology and thickness of patella with gracillis tendon thickness and quadriceps thickness. The study provides new variables of patellar thickness and ACL tibial footprint diameter for the assessment of autograft thickness. These values may be taken for preoperative assessment, planning and counselling of patients especially in cases of multi ligamentous knee injuries wherein it would help the surgeon to navigate the surgery without enduring intraoperative difficulties and postoperative failures with autografts.


Conceptualization: BSR. Data acquisition: KG, AV. Data analysis or interpretation: SS, SM. Drafting of the manuscript: BSR. Critical revision of the manuscript: KG. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.


No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  1. Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ Jr, Dhawan A. Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy 2014;30:882-90.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Magnussen RA, Lawrence JT, West RL, Toth AP, Taylor DC, Garrett WE. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy 2012;28:526-31.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Park SY, Oh H, Park S, Lee JH, Lee SH, Yoon KH. Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:1111-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. O'Brien SJ, Warren RF, Pavlov H, Panariello R, Wickiewicz TL. Reconstruction of the chronically insufficient anterior cruciate ligament with the central third of the patellar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:278-86.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Pagnani MJ, Warner JJ, O'Brien SJ, Warren RF. Anatomic considerations in harvesting the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and a technique of harvest. Am J Sports Med 1993;21:565-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Boisvert CB, Aubin ME, DeAngelis N. Relationship between anthropometric measurements and hamstring autograft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2011;40:293-5.
    Pubmed
  7. Chiang ER, Ma HL, Wang ST, Hung SC, Liu CL, Chen TH. Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:916-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W, Fu FH, Harner CD. Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 2010;17:81-3.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Thomas S, Bhattacharya R, Saltikov JB, Kramer DJ. Influence of anthropometric features on graft diameter in ACL reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133:215-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Wernecke G, Harris IA, Houang MT, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ. Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011;27:1055-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Zakko P, van Eck CF, Guenther D, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH. Can we predict the size of frequently used autografts in ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25:3704-10.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, Adler B, Klingele K, Phillips G. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 2008;24:1336-41.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Camarda L, Grassedonio E, Albano D, Galia M, Midiri M, D'Arienzo M. MRI evaluation to predict tendon size for knee ligament reconstruction. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2018;7:478-84.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Beyzadeoglu T, Akgun U, Tasdelen N, Karahan M. Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:1293-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Hamada M, Shino K, Mitsuoka T, Abe N, Horibe S. Cross-sectional area measurement of the semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1998;14:696-701.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Challa S, Satyaprasad J. Hamstring graft size and anthropometry in south Indian population. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2013;4:135-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Goyal S, Matias N, Pandey V, Acharya K. Are pre-operative anthropometric parameters helpful in predicting length and thickness of quadrupled hamstring graft for ACL reconstruction in adults? A prospective study and literature review. Int Orthop 2016;40:173-81.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Sundararajan SR, Rajagopalakrishnan R, Rajasekaran S. Is height the best predictor for adequacy of semitendinosus-alone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A study of hamstring graft dimensions and anthropometric measurements. Int Orthop 2016;40:1025-31.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Chang CB, Seong SC, Kim TK. Preoperative magnetic resonance assessment of patellar tendon dimensions for graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:376-82.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Muhamed R, Saralaya VV, Murlimanju BV, Chettiar GK. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging morphometry of the patella bone in South Indian population. Anat Cell Biol 2017;50:99-103.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Stäubli HU, Rauschning W. Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position. Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1994;2:138-46.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Hodges CT, Shelton TJ, Bateni CP, Henrichon SS, Skaggs AW, Boutin RD, Lee CA, Haus BM, Marder RA. The medial epicondyle of the distal femur is the optimal location for MRI measurement of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon cross-sectional area. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019;27:3498-504.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Hanna A, Hollnagel K, Whitmer K, John C, Johnson B, Godin J, Miller T. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging prediction of anterior cruciate ligament autograft size and comparison of radiologist and orthopaedic surgeon predictions. Orthop J Sports Med 2019;7:2325967119889593.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM. Hamstring graft size prediction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:2204-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C. Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2008;37:157-9.
    Pubmed
  26. Loo WL, Liu BYE, Lee YHD, Soon YHM. Can we predict ACL hamstring graft sizes in the Asian male? A clinical relationship study of anthropometric features and 4-strand hamstring graft sizes. Malays Orthop J 2010;4:9-12.
    CrossRef
  27. Cobanoglu M, Ozgezmez FT, Omurlu IK, Ozkan I, Savk SO, Cullu E. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of semitendinosus tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: does this have an effect on graft choice? Indian J Orthop 2016;50:499-504.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Share this article on :