ACB 로고

pISSN 2093-3665 eISSN 2093-3673
Table. 1.

Incidence of variant origin of suprarenal arteries

Authors (year) Population/region No. and type of specimens Variations
Superior suprarenal arteries Middle suprarenal arteries Inferior suprarenal arteries
R L R L R L
Dobbie and Symington (1966) [16] Scotland 20 autopsies of human adults, 50 adult patients S: 100% M: 100% I: 100%
Lamarque et al. (1973) [14] France 255 total aortography, 373 selective arteriography of suprarenal gland S: 100% -

I: 51.5%

Iab: 48.5%

I: 44%

Iab: 56%

Toni et al. (1988) [15] Italy 100 abdominal angiographies

S: 92%

SCT: 5%

SAA: 3%

S: 79%

SAA: 16%

SIC: 3%

SCT: 2%

M: 91%

MCT: 4%

MIP: 3%

MRA: 2%

M: 99%

MCT: 1%

I: 96%

IPR: 2%

IAA: 2%

I: 95%

IAA: 5%

Bianchi and Ferrari (1991) [4] Argentina 50 fetuses S: 100%

S: 96%

SCT: 4%

M: 68%

MIP: 32%

M: 68%

MIP: 20%

MCT: 12%

I: 60%

I+IGA: 12%

ISPA: 4%

ISPA+IGA: 12%

IAA: 4%

IGA: 4%

IAGA: 4%

I: 40%

IAA: 24%

IGA: 8%

I+IGA: 8%

IAGA: 4%

IGA+IAGA: 4%

I+ISPA: 4%

IAA+ISPA: 4%

I SPA+IGA: 4%

Pityński et al. (1998) [3] Poland 40 fetuses S: 100%

S: 95%

S+SAA: 5%

M: 32.5%

MIP: 27.5%

M+MIP: 15%

MRA: 17.5%

MGA: 7.5%

M: 47.5%

MIP: 17.5%

M+MSSA: 2.5%

M+MIP: 22.5%

MRA: 7.5%

MGA: 2.5%

I: 55%

I+IAA: 25%

I+ISPA: 5%

I+IGA: 7.5%

I+IGA+IAA: 2.5%

I+IAA+ISPA: 2.5%

ISMA: 2.5%

I: 47.5%

I+IAA: 32.5%

I+ISPA: 2.5%

I+IGA: 12.5%

I+IGA+IAA: 10%

I+IGA+ISPA: 5%

Manso and DiDio (2000) [12] Brazil 30 pairs of suprarenal glands

S: 86.7%

SCT: 6.7%

SAA: 3.3%

SAA+SISA: 3.3%

S: 83.3%

SCT: 6.7%

SAA: 10%

M: 53.3%

MIP: 26.7%

MSSA: 3.3%

MISA: 6.7%

MSMA: 3.3%

MRA: 3.3%

MCT: 3.3%

MAA: 46.7%

MIP: 26.7%

MSSA: 10.0%

MISA: 6.7%

MSMA: 3.3%

MRA: 3.3%

MCT: 3.3%

MRA: 3.3%

I: 70%

IAA: 26.7%

IAA+ISSA: 3.3%

I: 50%

IAA: 36.7%

ISPA: 3.3%

IIPA: 3.3%

IGA: 6.6%

Yalçin et al. (2004) [29] Turkey 25 years old female cadaver - MCT I
Cimen et al. (2007) [30] Turkey 45 years old male cadaver - MRA M I -
Deepthinath et al. (2006) [31] South Indian 45 years old male cadaver - MRA MCT I -
Dutta (2010) [5] North Indian 68 human cadavers S: 100%

S: 76%

SAA: 18%

SSA: 6%

M: 53%

MARA: 18%

Absent: 29%

M: 94%

MARA: 6%

I: 76%

IGA: 18%

IAA: 6%

I: 59%

IGA: 6%

Absent: 35%

Oztürk et al. (2010) [24] Turkey 50 years old male cadaver Absent M IAA
Jyothsna et al. (2012) [36] South Indian 55 years old male cadaver - - - IAA
Chakravarthi (2014) [21] South Indian Middle-aged male cadaver SAA SAA M M - -
Sushma et al. (2014) [17] South Indian 20 cadavers S: 100% S: 100%

M: 80%

MRA: 10%

MARA: 5%

MIP: 5%

M: 90%

MIP: 5%

MCT: 5%

I: 90%

IARA: 5%

IIP: 5%

I: 90%

IARA: 10%

Sarkar et al. (2014) [18] Northeast India 54 years old male cadaver S SCT M Absent I I
Ahmed et al. (2015) [20] South Indian 25 adult and 50 fetal cadavers

S: 88%

Sab: 12%

M: 93.34%

Mab: 6.66%

I: 93.34%

Iab: 6.66%

Lakshmi and Dhoot (2016) [6] North Indian 15 adult human cadavers S: 100% S: 100%

M: 83.33%

MARA: 13.33%

MRA: 3.33%

M: 96.66%

MCT: 3.33%

I: 83.33%

IARA: 16.66%

I: 66.66%

IARA: 33.33%

Shanthakumar et al. (2016) [19] South Indian 58 years old male cadaver S - M - I IGA
Olewnik et al. (2018) [22] Poland 64 years old male cadaver SRA Absent I
Greeff et al. (2019) [27] South African 50 fetuses

S: 98%

Absent: 2%

S: 98%

Absent: 2%

M: 18%

MRA: 62%

Absent: 20%

M: 34%

MRA: 26%

Absent: 40%

I: 90%

IAA: 10%

I: 92%

IAA: 6%

IARA: 2%

Vinitha and Parthasarathy (2020) [37] South Indian 48 cadavers

S: 81.33%

SAA: 16.67%

SCT: 2%

M: 98%

Absent: 2%

I: 98%

IAA: 2%

Xu et al. (2020) [42] Chinese 168 fetuses -

M: 89.2%

Absent: 10.79%

-
South Indiana) 147

S: 86.8%

SAA: 6.2%

SCT: 0.8%

Sab: 6.2%

M: 92.8%

Mabsent: 0.7%

MAB: 3.4%

MRA: 1%

MARA: 0.3%

MCT: 0.7%

MIP: 0.7%

I: 92.9%

IAA: 1%

IARA: 10.2%

IIP: 0.3%

Iab: 3.4%

IGA: 0.3%

North Indianb) 83

S: 90.4%

SAA: 7.2%

SSA: 2.4%

M: 76%

MARA: 11%

MCT: 0.4%

MRA: 0.4%

Absent: 12%

I: 73.5%

IGA: 9.7%

IAA: 2.4%

IARA: 4.7%

Iabsent: 9.7%

Caucasiansc) 919

S: 97.5%

SAA: 1.3%

SCT: 0.8%

SIC: 0.1%

SAA+SISA: 0.1%

S+SAA: 0.1%

SRA: 0.1%

M: 93.5%

Mabsent: 0.1%

MIP: 3.4%

MSSA: 0.2%

MISA: 0.2%

MSMA: 0.1%

MRA: 0.7%

MCT: 0.7%

M+MSSA: 0.1%

M+MIP: 0.8%

MGA: 0.2%

I: 57.7%

Iab: 35.7%

IIPA: 0.05%

IPR: 0.1%

IAA: 2.06%

I+IGA: 0.9%

ISPA: 0.2%

IGA: 0.4%

ISPA+IGA: 0.4%

IAGA: 0.2%

IGA+IAGA: 0.1%

I+ISPA: 0.3%

IAA+ISSA: 0.1%

I+IAA: 1.3%

I+ISSA: 0.05%

I+IGA+IAA: 0.2%

I+IAA+ISPA: 0.05%

I+IGA+ISPA: 0.1%

Turkishd) 3

S: 66.7%

Absent: 33.3%

M: 66.7%

MCT: 33.3%

MRA: 33.3%

I: 66.7%

IAA: 33.3%

The subscript in the table is denoting the origin of the respective arteries: ab, abnormal origin; AA, abdominal aorta; CT, coeliac trunk; IC, intercostal artery; IP, inferior phrenic artery; RA, renal artery; PR, polar renal artery; GA, gonadal artery; SPA, superior polar artery; AGA, accessory gonadal artery; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; ISA, inferior suprarenal artery; SSA, superior suprarenal artery; IPA, inferior polar artery; SA, splenic artery; ARA, accessory renal artery. a)Average results for the South Indian population include Deepthinath et al. (2006) [31], Jyothsna et al. (2012) [36], Chakravarthi (2014) [21], Sushma et al. (2014) [17], Ahmed et al. (2015) [20], Shanthakumar et al. (2016) [19], Vinitha and Parthasarathy (2020) [37]. b)Average results for North Indian population include Dutta (2010) [5], Lakshmi and Dhoot (2016) [6]. c)Average results for Caucasian population include Dobbie and Symington (1966) [16], Lamarque et al. (1973) [14], Toni et al. (1988) [15], Bianchi and Ferrari (1991) [4], Pityński et al. (1998) [3], Manso and DiDio (2000) [12], Olewnik et al. (2018) [22]. d)Average results for Turkish population includes Yalçin et al. (2004) [29], Cimen et al. (2007) [30], Oztürk et al. (2010) [24]. R, right; L, left; S, normal origin of superior suprarenal artery; M, normal origin of middle suprarenal artery; I, normal origin of inferior suprarenal artery.

Anat Cell Biol 2022;55:525~528 https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.21.211E
© Anat Cell Biol

© Anatomy & Cell Biology. All Rights Reserved. Powered by INFOrang.co., Ltd