Incidence of variant origin of suprarenal arteries
Authors (year) | Population/region | No. and type of specimens | Variations | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Superior suprarenal arteries | Middle suprarenal arteries | Inferior suprarenal arteries | ||||||||
R | L | R | L | R | L | |||||
Dobbie and Symington (1966) [16] | Scotland | 20 autopsies of human adults, 50 adult patients | S: 100% | M: 100% | I: 100% | |||||
Lamarque et al. (1973) [14] | France | 255 total aortography, 373 selective arteriography of suprarenal gland | S: 100% | - |
I: 51.5% Iab: 48.5% |
I: 44% Iab: 56% |
||||
Toni et al. (1988) [15] | Italy | 100 abdominal angiographies |
S: 92% SCT: 5% SAA: 3% |
S: 79% SAA: 16% SIC: 3% SCT: 2% |
M: 91% MCT: 4% MIP: 3% MRA: 2% |
M: 99% MCT: 1% |
I: 96% IPR: 2% IAA: 2% |
I: 95% IAA: 5% |
||
Bianchi and Ferrari (1991) [4] | Argentina | 50 fetuses | S: 100% |
S: 96% SCT: 4% |
M: 68% MIP: 32% |
M: 68% MIP: 20% MCT: 12% |
I: 60% I+IGA: 12% ISPA: 4% ISPA+IGA: 12% IAA: 4% IGA: 4% IAGA: 4% |
I: 40% IAA: 24% IGA: 8% I+IGA: 8% IAGA: 4% IGA+IAGA: 4% I+ISPA: 4% IAA+ISPA: 4% I SPA+IGA: 4% |
||
Pityński et al. (1998) [3] | Poland | 40 fetuses | S: 100% |
S: 95% S+SAA: 5% |
M: 32.5% MIP: 27.5% M+MIP: 15% MRA: 17.5% MGA: 7.5% |
M: 47.5% MIP: 17.5% M+MSSA: 2.5% M+MIP: 22.5% MRA: 7.5% MGA: 2.5% |
I: 55% I+IAA: 25% I+ISPA: 5% I+IGA: 7.5% I+IGA+IAA: 2.5% I+IAA+ISPA: 2.5% ISMA: 2.5% |
I: 47.5% I+IAA: 32.5% I+ISPA: 2.5% I+IGA: 12.5% I+IGA+IAA: 10% I+IGA+ISPA: 5% |
||
Manso and DiDio (2000) [12] | Brazil | 30 pairs of suprarenal glands |
S: 86.7% SCT: 6.7% SAA: 3.3% SAA+SISA: 3.3% |
S: 83.3% SCT: 6.7% SAA: 10% |
M: 53.3% MIP: 26.7% MSSA: 3.3% MISA: 6.7% MSMA: 3.3% MRA: 3.3% MCT: 3.3% |
MAA: 46.7% MIP: 26.7% MSSA: 10.0% MISA: 6.7% MSMA: 3.3% MRA: 3.3% MCT: 3.3% MRA: 3.3% |
I: 70% IAA: 26.7% IAA+ISSA: 3.3% |
I: 50% IAA: 36.7% ISPA: 3.3% IIPA: 3.3% IGA: 6.6% |
||
Yalçin et al. (2004) [29] | Turkey | 25 years old female cadaver | - | MCT | I | |||||
Cimen et al. (2007) [30] | Turkey | 45 years old male cadaver | - | MRA | M | I | - | |||
Deepthinath et al. (2006) [31] | South Indian | 45 years old male cadaver | - | MRA | MCT | I | - | |||
Dutta (2010) [5] | North Indian | 68 human cadavers | S: 100% |
S: 76% SAA: 18% SSA: 6% |
M: 53% MARA: 18% Absent: 29% |
M: 94% MARA: 6% |
I: 76% IGA: 18% IAA: 6% |
I: 59% IGA: 6% Absent: 35% |
||
Oztürk et al. (2010) [24] | Turkey | 50 years old male cadaver | Absent | M | IAA | |||||
Jyothsna et al. (2012) [36] | South Indian | 55 years old male cadaver | - | - | - | IAA | ||||
Chakravarthi (2014) [21] | South Indian | Middle-aged male cadaver | SAA | SAA | M | M | - | - | ||
Sushma et al. (2014) [17] | South Indian | 20 cadavers | S: 100% | S: 100% |
M: 80% MRA: 10% MARA: 5% MIP: 5% |
M: 90% MIP: 5% MCT: 5% |
I: 90% IARA: 5% IIP: 5% |
I: 90% IARA: 10% |
||
Sarkar et al. (2014) [18] | Northeast India | 54 years old male cadaver | S | SCT | M | Absent | I | I | ||
Ahmed et al. (2015) [20] | South Indian | 25 adult and 50 fetal cadavers |
S: 88% Sab: 12% |
M: 93.34% Mab: 6.66% |
I: 93.34% Iab: 6.66% |
|||||
Lakshmi and Dhoot (2016) [6] | North Indian | 15 adult human cadavers | S: 100% | S: 100% |
M: 83.33% MARA: 13.33% MRA: 3.33% |
M: 96.66% MCT: 3.33% |
I: 83.33% IARA: 16.66% |
I: 66.66% IARA: 33.33% |
||
Shanthakumar et al. (2016) [19] | South Indian | 58 years old male cadaver | S | - | M | - | I | IGA | ||
Olewnik et al. (2018) [22] | Poland | 64 years old male cadaver | SRA | Absent | I | |||||
Greeff et al. (2019) [27] | South African | 50 fetuses |
S: 98% Absent: 2% |
S: 98% Absent: 2% |
M: 18% MRA: 62% Absent: 20% |
M: 34% MRA: 26% Absent: 40% |
I: 90% IAA: 10% |
I: 92% IAA: 6% IARA: 2% |
||
Vinitha and Parthasarathy (2020) [37] | South Indian | 48 cadavers |
S: 81.33% SAA: 16.67% SCT: 2% |
M: 98% Absent: 2% |
I: 98% IAA: 2% |
|||||
Xu et al. (2020) [42] | Chinese | 168 fetuses | - |
M: 89.2% Absent: 10.79% |
- | |||||
South Indian |
147 |
S: 86.8% SAA: 6.2% SCT: 0.8% Sab: 6.2% |
M: 92.8% Mabsent: 0.7% MAB: 3.4% MRA: 1% MARA: 0.3% MCT: 0.7% MIP: 0.7% |
I: 92.9% IAA: 1% IARA: 10.2% IIP: 0.3% Iab: 3.4% IGA: 0.3% |
||||||
North Indian |
83 |
S: 90.4% SAA: 7.2% SSA: 2.4% |
M: 76% MARA: 11% MCT: 0.4% MRA: 0.4% Absent: 12% |
I: 73.5% IGA: 9.7% IAA: 2.4% IARA: 4.7% Iabsent: 9.7% |
||||||
Caucasians |
919 |
S: 97.5% SAA: 1.3% SCT: 0.8% SIC: 0.1% SAA+SISA: 0.1% S+SAA: 0.1% SRA: 0.1% |
M: 93.5% Mabsent: 0.1% MIP: 3.4% MSSA: 0.2% MISA: 0.2% MSMA: 0.1% MRA: 0.7% MCT: 0.7% M+MSSA: 0.1% M+MIP: 0.8% MGA: 0.2% |
I: 57.7% Iab: 35.7% IIPA: 0.05% IPR: 0.1% IAA: 2.06% I+IGA: 0.9% ISPA: 0.2% IGA: 0.4% ISPA+IGA: 0.4% IAGA: 0.2% IGA+IAGA: 0.1% I+ISPA: 0.3% IAA+ISSA: 0.1% I+IAA: 1.3% I+ISSA: 0.05% I+IGA+IAA: 0.2% I+IAA+ISPA: 0.05% I+IGA+ISPA: 0.1% |
||||||
Turkish |
3 |
S: 66.7% Absent: 33.3% |
M: 66.7% MCT: 33.3% MRA: 33.3% |
I: 66.7% IAA: 33.3% |
The subscript in the table is denoting the origin of the respective arteries: ab, abnormal origin; AA, abdominal aorta; CT, coeliac trunk; IC, intercostal artery; IP, inferior phrenic artery; RA, renal artery; PR, polar renal artery; GA, gonadal artery; SPA, superior polar artery; AGA, accessory gonadal artery; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; ISA, inferior suprarenal artery; SSA, superior suprarenal artery; IPA, inferior polar artery; SA, splenic artery; ARA, accessory renal artery. a)Average results for the South Indian population include Deepthinath et al. (2006) [31], Jyothsna et al. (2012) [36], Chakravarthi (2014) [21], Sushma et al. (2014) [17], Ahmed et al. (2015) [20], Shanthakumar et al. (2016) [19], Vinitha and Parthasarathy (2020) [37]. b)Average results for North Indian population include Dutta (2010) [5], Lakshmi and Dhoot (2016) [6]. c)Average results for Caucasian population include Dobbie and Symington (1966) [16], Lamarque et al. (1973) [14], Toni et al. (1988) [15], Bianchi and Ferrari (1991) [4], Pityński et al. (1998) [3], Manso and DiDio (2000) [12], Olewnik et al. (2018) [22]. d)Average results for Turkish population includes Yalçin et al. (2004) [29], Cimen et al. (2007) [30], Oztürk et al. (2010) [24]. R, right; L, left; S, normal origin of superior suprarenal artery; M, normal origin of middle suprarenal artery; I, normal origin of inferior suprarenal artery.
© Anatomy & Cell Biology. All Rights Reserved. Powered by INFOrang.co., Ltd