Anatomy & Cell Biology

Table 1

Incidence of variant origin of suprarenal arteries

Authors (year)	Population/region	No. and type of specimens	Variations
			Superior suprarenal arteries		Middle suprarenal arteries		Inferior suprarenal arteries
			R	L	R	L	R	L
Dobbie and Symington (1966) [16]	Scotland	20 autopsies of human adults, 50 adult patients	S: 100%		M: 100%		I: 100%
Lamarque et al. (1973) [14]	France	255 total aortography, 373 selective arteriography of suprarenal gland	S: 100%		-		I: 51.5% I_ab: 48.5%	I: 44% I_ab: 56%
Toni et al. (1988) [15]	Italy	100 abdominal angiographies	S: 92% S_CT: 5% S_AA: 3%	S: 79% S_AA: 16% S_IC: 3% S_CT: 2%	M: 91% M_CT: 4% M_IP: 3% M_RA: 2%	M: 99% M_CT: 1%	I: 96% I_PR: 2% I_AA: 2%	I: 95% I_AA: 5%
Bianchi and Ferrari (1991) [4]	Argentina	50 fetuses	S: 100%	S: 96% S_CT: 4%	M: 68% M_IP: 32%	M: 68% M_IP: 20% M_CT: 12%	I: 60% I+I_GA: 12% I_SPA: 4% I_SPA+I_GA: 12% I_AA: 4% I_GA: 4% I_AGA: 4%	I: 40% I_AA: 24% I_GA: 8% I+I_GA: 8% IA_GA: 4% I_GA+I_AGA: 4% I+I_SPA: 4% I_AA+I_SPA: 4% I _SPA+I_GA: 4%
Pityński et al. (1998) [3]	Poland	40 fetuses	S: 100%	S: 95% S+S_AA: 5%	M: 32.5% M_IP: 27.5% M+M_IP: 15% M_RA: 17.5% M_GA: 7.5%	M: 47.5% M_IP: 17.5% M+M_SSA: 2.5% M+M_IP: 22.5% M_RA: 7.5% M_GA: 2.5%	I: 55% I+I_AA: 25% I+I_SPA: 5% I+I_GA: 7.5% I+I_GA+I_AA: 2.5% I+I_AA+I_SPA: 2.5% I_SMA: 2.5%	I: 47.5% I+I_AA: 32.5% I+I_SPA: 2.5% I+I_GA: 12.5% I+I_GA+I_AA: 10% I+I_GA+I_SPA: 5%
Manso and DiDio (2000) [12]	Brazil	30 pairs of suprarenal glands	S: 86.7% S_CT: 6.7% S_AA: 3.3% S_AA+S_ISA: 3.3%	S: 83.3% S_CT: 6.7% S_AA: 10%	M: 53.3% M_IP: 26.7% M_SSA: 3.3% M_ISA: 6.7% M_SMA: 3.3% M_RA: 3.3% M_CT: 3.3%	M_AA: 46.7% M_IP: 26.7% M_SSA: 10.0% M_ISA: 6.7% M_SMA: 3.3% M_RA: 3.3% M_CT: 3.3% M_RA: 3.3%	I: 70% I_AA: 26.7% I_AA+I_SSA: 3.3%	I: 50% I_AA: 36.7% I_SPA: 3.3% I_IPA: 3.3% I_GA: 6.6%
Yalçin et al. (2004) [29]	Turkey	25 years old female cadaver	-		M_CT		I
Cimen et al. (2007) [30]	Turkey	45 years old male cadaver	-		M_RA	M	I	-
Deepthinath et al. (2006) [31]	South Indian	45 years old male cadaver	-		M_RA	M_CT	I	-
Dutta (2010) [5]	North Indian	68 human cadavers	S: 100%	S: 76% S_AA: 18% S_SA: 6%	M: 53% M_ARA: 18% Absent: 29%	M: 94% M_ARA: 6%	I: 76% I_GA: 18% I_AA: 6%	I: 59% I_GA: 6% Absent: 35%
Oztürk et al. (2010) [24]	Turkey	50 years old male cadaver	Absent		M		I_AA
Jyothsna et al. (2012) [36]	South Indian	55 years old male cadaver	-		-		-	I_AA
Chakravarthi (2014) [21]	South Indian	Middle-aged male cadaver	S_AA	S_AA	M	M	-	-
Sushma et al. (2014) [17]	South Indian	20 cadavers	S: 100%	S: 100%	M: 80% M_RA: 10% M_ARA: 5% M_IP: 5%	M: 90% M_IP: 5% M_CT: 5%	I: 90% I_ARA: 5% I_IP: 5%	I: 90% I_ARA: 10%
Sarkar et al. (2014) [18]	Northeast India	54 years old male cadaver	S	S_CT	M	Absent	I	I
Ahmed et al. (2015) [20]	South Indian	25 adult and 50 fetal cadavers	S: 88% S_ab: 12%		M: 93.34% M_ab: 6.66%		I: 93.34% I_ab: 6.66%
Lakshmi and Dhoot (2016) [6]	North Indian	15 adult human cadavers	S: 100%	S: 100%	M: 83.33% M_ARA: 13.33% M_RA: 3.33%	M: 96.66% M_CT: 3.33%	I: 83.33% I_ARA: 16.66%	I: 66.66% I_ARA: 33.33%
Shanthakumar et al. (2016) [19]	South Indian	58 years old male cadaver	S	-	M	-	I	IGA
Olewnik et al. (2018) [22]	Poland	64 years old male cadaver	S_RA		Absent		I
Greeff et al. (2019) [27]	South African	50 fetuses	S: 98% Absent: 2%	S: 98% Absent: 2%	M: 18% M_RA: 62% Absent: 20%	M: 34% M_RA: 26% Absent: 40%	I: 90% I_AA: 10%	I: 92% I_AA: 6% I_ARA: 2%
Vinitha and Parthasarathy (2020) [37]	South Indian	48 cadavers	S: 81.33% S_AA: 16.67% S_CT: 2%		M: 98% Absent: 2%		I: 98% I_AA: 2%
Xu et al. (2020) [42]	Chinese	843 fetuses	-		M: 89.2% Absent: 10.79%		-
South Indian^a)		147	S: 86.8% S_AA: 6.2% S_CT: 0.8% S_ab: 6.2%		M: 92.8% M_absent: 0.7% M_AB: 3.4% M_RA: 1% M_ARA: 0.3% M_CT: 0.7% M_IP: 0.7%		I: 92.9% I_AA: 1% I_ARA: 10.2% I_IP: 0.3% I_ab: 3.4% I_GA: 0.3%
North Indian^b)		83	S: 90.4% S_AA: 7.2% S_SA: 2.4%		M: 76% M_ARA: 11% M_CT: 0.4% M_RA: 0.4% Absent: 12%		I: 73.5% I_GA: 9.7% I_AA: 2.4% I_ARA: 4.7% I_absent: 9.7%
Caucasians^c)		919	S: 97.5% S_AA: 1.3% S_CT: 0.8% S_IC: 0.1% S_AA+S_ISA: 0.1% S+S_AA: 0.1% S_RA: 0.1%		M: 93.5% M_absent: 0.1% M_IP: 3.4% M_SSA: 0.2% M_ISA: 0.2% M_SMA: 0.1% M_RA: 0.7% M_CT: 0.7% M+M_SSA: 0.1% M+M_IP: 0.8% M_GA: 0.2%		I: 57.7% I_ab: 35.7% I_IPA: 0.05% I_PR: 0.1% I_AA: 2.06% I+I_GA: 0.9% I_SPA: 0.2% I_GA: 0.4% I_SPA+I_GA: 0.4% I_AGA: 0.2% I_GA+I_AGA: 0.1% I+I_SPA: 0.3% I_AA+I_SSA: 0.1% I+I_AA: 1.3% I+I_SSA: 0.05% I+I_GA+I_AA: 0.2% I+I_AA+I_SPA: 0.05% I+I_GA+I_SPA: 0.1%
Turkish^d)		3	S: 66.7% Absent: 33.3%		M: 66.7% M_CT: 33.3% M_RA: 33.3%		I: 66.7% I_AA: 33.3%

The subscript in the table is denoting the origin of the respective arteries: ab, abnormal origin; AA, abdominal aorta; CT, coeliac trunk; IC, intercostal artery; IP, inferior phrenic artery; RA, renal artery; PR, polar renal artery; GA, gonadal artery; SPA, superior polar artery; AGA, accessory gonadal artery; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; ISA, inferior suprarenal artery; SSA, superior suprarenal artery; IPA, inferior polar artery; SA, splenic artery; ARA, accessory renal artery. ^a)Average results for the South Indian population include Deepthinath et al. (2006) [31], Jyothsna et al. (2012) [36], Chakravarthi (2014) [21], Sushma et al. (2014) [17], Ahmed et al. (2015) [20], Shanthakumar et al. (2016) [19], Vinitha and Parthasarathy (2020) [37]. ^b)Average results for North Indian population include Dutta (2010) [5], Lakshmi and Dhoot (2016) [6]. ^c)Average results for Caucasian population include Dobbie and Symington (1966) [16], Lamarque et al. (1973) [14], Toni et al. (1988) [15], Bianchi and Ferrari (1991) [4], Pityński et al. (1998) [3], Manso and DiDio (2000) [12], Olewnik et al. (2018) [22]. ^d)Average results for Turkish population includes Yalçin et al. (2004) [29], Cimen et al. (2007) [30], Oztürk et al. (2010) [24]. R, right; L, left; S, normal origin of superior suprarenal artery; M, normal origin of middle suprarenal artery; I, normal origin of inferior suprarenal artery.

Anat Cell Biol 2022;55:28~39 https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.21.211